World financial news

Egypt’s military sought to isolate pro-democracy activists protesting against their rule, depicting them as conspirators and vandals, as troops and protesters clashed for a third straight day, pelting each other with stones near parliament in the heart of the capital.

At least 10 protesters have been killed and 441 others wounded in the three days of violence, according to the Health Ministry. Activists say most of the 10 fatalities died of gunshot wounds.

The fighting, sparked when troops sought to break up a sit-in outside the Cabinet headquarters, has seen a particularly heavy hand by the military. Military police have been shown in video footage dragging women by the hair, even stripping the shirt off one veiled woman, and ferociously beating, kicking and stomping on protesters cowering on the ground.

Still, the protesters’ numbers have remained smaller than earlier rallies _ suggesting even anger over the disturbing images was not drawing the broader Egyptian public into a confrontation with the military, which activists behind the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak’s autocratic regime 10 months ago accuse of mismanaging the transition period and committing human rights abuses.

In a statement posted on its Facebook page, the ruling military council on Sunday called the clashes part of a “conspiracy” against Egypt. It said its forces had the right to defend the “property of the great people of Egypt.”

Seeking to depict the protesters as hooligans _ and apparently to counter the widely published images of protesters being beaten _ it also posted on the page footage of young men throwing rocks at a basement window of the parliament building and of at least one man trying to set the place ablaze.

The ruling generals have taken advantage of the growing frustration of many Egyptians over worsening economic hardships and tenuous security, blaming demonstrations, strikes and sit-ins for their predicament. The tactic, coupled with the military’s efforts to stain the reputation of the youth groups behind Mubarak’s ouster, appears to have worked.

The military has been using the state media and loyal private TV stations to project an image of itself as the protector of the nation and filling its public statements with patriotism and grave warnings of a dire future if political turmoil persisted.

Protest leaders increasingly complain that they feel isolated in a society that has grown more concerned with making ends meet than political rights. Many Egyptians see the ongoing, multistage parliamentary elections as a path to stability and an end to military rule.

“The military council uses every opportunity to show itself as the land’s strongest institution,” said Mohammed Abbas, an activist who defected from the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s largest and best organized political group, to side with youth groups more active in protests. “We are making it easier for the generals by our divisions and isolation.”

In Sunday’s clash, protesters and troops battled on two main streets off of central Tahrir Square, trading volleys of stones and firebombs around barriers that the military set up to block the avenues.

One of the streets is site of a research center set up during the three-year occupation of Egypt by France in the late 18th century. The building was almost completely gutted by a fire which broke out during the height of the clashes on Saturday, when troops on its roof and on other nearby rooftops hurled rocks down on protesters below.

Protesters, who blame the fire on the troops, have been trying to salvage valuable books and documents from the center, whose two-story building is now in danger of collapsing after its roof caved in.

The deepening hostility between the ruling military council and the protest leaders is in sharp contrast to the days of the popular uprising against Mubarak in January and February when army troops ordered out on the streets to take over from the hated police were given a warm welcome by hundreds of thousands of protesters in Cairo and elsewhere. The military at the time said it wouldn’t fire on protesters.

When the military stepped into power after Mubarak’s Feb. 11 resignation, it was largely embraced by the public.

Sunday’s renewed violence was also taking place as unofficial results from a second round of voting in parliamentary elections showed Islamist parties, led by the Muslim Brotherhood, continuing their dominance at the polls. Liberal and left leaning parties, many of which sympathetic to the revolutionaries, have been trounced at the ballots.

The third and final round of voting is slated for next month in nine of Egypt’s 27 provinces.

The Islamists have been staying clear of the recent violence, fearing that they could jeopardize their electoral gains by taking part in the protests. Their stance has prompted many activists to accuse them of political opportunism.

The clashes began early Friday when one of several hundred peaceful protesters staging a sit-in outside the Cabinet offices near parliament was detained and beaten by troops. The protesters began their sit-in three weeks ago to demand that the nation’s ruling military immediately step down and hand over power to a civilian administration.

Activists have been trying to drum up public sympathy for their cause by flooding social network sites with photos and video from the troops’ brutal assaults he past two days.

“Liars,” proclaimed a red headline on the front page of the independent Al-Tahrir newspaper, referring to repeated denials by the military council and military-appointed Prime Minister Kamal el-Ganzouri that no force or live ammunition were used against the protesters. With the headline, the paper ran a photo of the woman protester who was half-stripped by attacking soldiers. Other widely circulating footage shows an army officer running toward protesters while firing a pistol at them, though it is not clear from the footage whether he was using live ammunition.

Source

An economic planning conference of China’s top leaders is expected to endorse fine-tuning of policies to support growth while seeking to keep inflation in check.

The powerful Politburo of the ruling Communist Party met last week and announced plans to keep a “prudent” monetary policy that would curb price hikes while adopting “pro-active” spending to promote growth. That has set the tone for the meeting in Beijing that begins Monday.

China has made headway in slowing price hikes but weak demand for exports from the European Union and U.S. has raised worries the economy may slow too quickly, worsening labor unrest just as the party prepares for a succession to a new generation of leaders next year.

Since leaders are stressing continuity, no major shifts in policy are expected from the closed door economic work conference, which reportedly will end on Wednesday.

Export growth has fallen steadily since hitting a peak of nearly 36 percent in March, and data released over the weekend showed exports slowed further in November, as did imports, with the overall trade surplus plunging 35 percent.

Adding to those concerns is a cooling of the property sector _ a mainstay of growth but also politically sensitive due to prices having surged beyond what most ordinary families can afford.

China’s economic growth abated to 9.1 percent in the July-September quarter from 9.5 percent in the first half of the year, but many economists are forecasting it will fall below 9 percent in 2012 payday loan.

“We believe the risks are skewed to the downside,” Standard Chartered Bank said in a report released Monday. It said that for China to maintain a growth rate of 8.1 percent next year, it would need to keep relatively high rates of capital investment that may prove difficult giving funding shortages for banks, property developers, local governments and many small businesses.

The report also noted China’s struggle to “rebalance” its economy toward greater reliance on domestic consumer demand, rather than exports and investment in construction.

“Despite talk of ‘rebalancing,’ progress has been limited in recent years,” the report said. The share of investment in the overall economy exceeded 50 percent last year, up from 43 percent in 2008.

Instead of the massive stimulus spending ordered in late 2008 to counter the global crisis, analysts say authorities are more likely to rely on tax cuts and administrative measures to help encourage more consumer spending.

But while Beijing strives to encourage more domestic demand and reduce its reliance on construction investment and exports to drive growth, it is also vowing to focus more on boosting its trade with emerging economies that are more dynamic than those in the U.S. and crisis stricken Europe.

Source

Deep into overtime, negotiators from 194 nations worked straight through a second night, parsing drafts and seeking compromises to map out the future pathway to fight global warming.

Delegates, working on little sleep, huddled with allies to prepare for a decisive meeting later Saturday, when it will become clear whether the diverse and long-bickering parties can come together on a plan to extend and broaden the global campaign to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

“We think it’s important not to give up now. We have come a long way,” said a weary Connie Hedegaard, the European commissioner on climate issues, speaking more than 12 hours after the two-week conference had been scheduled to close Friday evening.

But she was concerned that the process was taking so long that ministers would leave before decisions could be adopted, costing hard-won momentum. “It would really really be a pity if we lose that now,” she told The Associated Press.

Small island countries and the world’s poorest nations lined up behind an EU plan to begin talks on a future agreement that would come into effect no later than 2020.

As negotiations progressed, the United States and India eased objections to compromise texts, but China remained a strong holdout, EU officials said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the continuing talks.

Under discussion was an extension of binding pledges by the EU and a few other industrial countries to cut carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. Those commitments expire next year.

The EU, the primary bloc bound by commitments under the 1997 protocol, conditioned an extension on starting new talks on an accord to succeed Kyoto. The talks would conclude by 2015, allowing five years for it to be ratified by national legislatures. The plan insists the new agreement equally oblige all countries _ not just the few industrial powers _ to abide by emission targets.

Developing countries are adamant that the Kyoto commitments continue since it is the only agreement that compels any nation to reduce emissions. Industrial countries say the document is deeply flawed because it makes no demands on heavily polluting developing countries. It was for that reason that the U.S. never ratified it.

Host country South Africa organized the final stages of negotiations into “indabas,” a Zulu-language word meaning important meetings that carry the weight of a rich African culture.

At the indaba, the chief delegate from fewer than 30 countries, each with one aide, sat around an oblong table to thrash over text. Dozens of delegates were allowed to stand and observe from the periphery of the room but not to participate.

After the first meeting that ran overnight into Friday morning, conference president Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, who is South Africa’s foreign minister, drafted an eight-point compromise on the key question of the legal form of a post-2020 regime. The wording would imply how tightly countries would be held accountable for their emissions.

But the text was too soft for the Europeans and for the most vulnerable countries threatened by rising oceans, more frequent droughts and fiercer storms.

With passion rarely heard in a negotiating room, countries like Barbados pleaded for language instructing all parties to dig deeper into their carbon emissions and to speed up the process, arguing that the survival of their countries and millions of climate-stressed people were at risk.

Nkoana-Mashabane drafted new text after midnight Saturday that largely answered those criticisms. The U.S. told the indaba it could live with the language, but the reactions of China and India were not clear.

Source

The best week for the stock market in more than two years is ending with major indexes nearly unchanged.

A surprise drop in the U.S. unemployment rate sent stocks higher early Friday, but the gains fizzled throughout the afternoon. European stock indexes and the euro rose after German Chancellor Angela Merkel made a speech pushing for tighter rules on government spending.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell less than a point to close at 12,019 payday loans. The S&P 500 index also fell less than a point to 1,244. The Nasdaq rose under a point to 2,627.

More than three stocks rose for every one that fell on the New York Stock Exchange. Trading volume was below average at 4 billion.

Source

Senate defeat of competing Democratic and Republican plans to extend a cut in the Social Security payroll tax has punted the issue to the House, where GOP leaders are facing ideological divisions within the party over whether to pass the tax holiday.

The focus is on the GOP-controlled House after Senate votes Thursday exposed wide reluctance by Republicans to go along with the costly proposal _ a centerpiece of President Barack Obama’s jobs agenda.

As expected, Senate Republicans defeated Obama’s plan to extend the payroll tax cut through the end of next year while also making it more generous for workers.

But in a vote that exposed rare divisions among Senate Republicans, more than two dozen of the GOP’s 47 lawmakers also voted to kill an alternative plan backed by their leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to renew an existing 2 percentage point payroll tax cut.

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Republicans weren’t planning on negotiating with Democrats before unveiling a payroll tax cut plan _ and the spending cuts to pay for it _ next week. But the Senate vote would seem to indicate that House Republicans will be hard-pressed to muscle a payroll tax cut through without Democratic support. And those votes could be hard to come by if the GOP plan contains spending cuts Democrats dislike.

Many Republicans and even some Democrats say the payroll tax cut hasn’t worked to boost jobs and is too costly with the deficit requiring the government to borrow 36 cents of every dollar it spends.

“I can’t find many people who even know that they’re getting it, OK?” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who opposed both plans. “So with that being said, we’re going to double down on something that we thought should have worked that didn’t work.”

Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., said after Thursday night’s vote that previous tax rebates “stimulated little and increased the debt a lot” and that it would be better to simply cut spending than turn around and use spending cuts on stimulus-style tax cuts.

The defeat of the competing Senate plans came as Boehner said for the first time that renewing the payroll tax cut would boost the lagging economy. Boehner also promised compromise on a renewal of long-term jobless benefits through the end of 2012.

The payroll tax cuts and unemployment benefits are at the center of a costly, politically-charged year-end agenda in which Democrats seem poised to prevail in renewing a tax cut that many Republicans back only reluctantly no faxing payday loans. But Republicans are insisting _ in a switch from last year _ that the payroll tax cut and jobless benefits be paid for by cutting spending.

Both parties are seeking the political high ground as next year’s elections loom, with Democrats accusing Republicans of siding with the rich, and Republicans countering that Democrats were taxing small business owners who create jobs.

The first payroll tax plan to fall was a Democratic measure that was at the heart of the jobs package Obama announced in September. It would cut the Social Security payroll tax from 6.2 percent to 3.1 percent next year and also extend the cut to employers, with its hefty $265 billion cost paid for by slapping a 3.25 percent surtax on income exceeding $1 million.

Republicans and a handful of Democrats combined to kill the measure on a 51-49 tally that fell well short of the 60 votes required under Senate rules. For the first time, a Republican, Susan Collins of Maine, voted to support the millionaires’ surcharge.

In a surprising result, Democrats and more than two dozen Republicans then voted 78-20 to kill the $120 billion GOP alternative that would have simply extended the existing 2 percentage point payroll tax cut, financed by freezing federal workers’ pay through 2015 and reducing the government bureaucracy.

Republicans offered a simple one-year continuation of the existing law, jettisoning Obama’s call to deepen the cut to 3.1 percentage point on workers’ first $106,800 in earnings, while expanding it to cut in half employers’ Social Security contributions for their $5 million in payroll.

To pay for the measure, Senate Republicans proposed freezing federal workers’ pay through 2015 _ extending a two-year-freeze recommended by Obama _ and reducing the bureaucracy by 200,000 jobs through attrition.

The Democratic plan would give a worker earning $50,000 a more than $1,500 tax cut; the GOP plan would provide a $1,000 tax cut for such an earner. A two-income family making $200,000 would reap a $6,000-plus tax cut under the Democratic plan and a $4,000 tax cut under the GOP version.

Source

If all goes as planned, the long-vacant Jefferson Arms will pulse with activity after a $106 million transformation that will convert it to a home for hundreds of young educators and a regional headquarters of Teach for America.

Work could begin next summer if McGowan Brothers Development meets its timetable for getting federal new markets tax credits and other public incentives as part of the financing to renovate what is among downtown’s largest empty buildings. Construction would take about 18 months, said Tim McGowan, who runs the company with brothers Bill, Seamus and Sean.

“The plan for the building is pretty much to bring it back to its original form,” McGowan said.

Removal of exterior panels installed in the 1950s on the two lower floors and replication of the terra cotta beneath is part of the plan, he said. McGowan Development also plans to restore the two-level lobby atrium, damaged from a leaky roof, and install a rooftop pool.

Key to the project is the agreement by Teach for America to move its St. Louis operation to the building, which is on the National Register of Historic Places. Scott Baier, the organization’s executive director in St. Louis, said Teach for America had agreed to occupy 5,000 square feet of space at the rehabbed Jefferson Arms. The agreement includes plans to later increase the space by an additional 6,000 square feet. Baier said Teach for America was outgrowing its current office at 1204 Washington Avenue.

Even more important to McGowan Development than filling some office space is the potential of renting hundreds of Jefferson Arms apartments to young teachers. McGowan said those doing their two-year Teach for America commitment to teach in inner-city schools would be able stretch their $36,000 salaries by paying cut-rate rent of about $675 a month for a two-bedroom, two-bathroom loft apartment.

Baier said as many as 150 new teachers would arrive in St. Louis in 2014, when the redone Jefferson Arms should be ready. McGowan said he hopes 250 teachers will eventually live in the building. The rehabbed building would have 450 to 500 apartments. Those not rented to teachers will be offered at market rates, McGowan said.

Pyramid Construction, the once high-flying downtown developer, paid $19 million for Jefferson Arms in 2006 and had planned to convert it to condos for senior housing. Pyramid collapsed in 2008 without starting work on the project although it cleared the building of tenants. Since then, the building has sat empty.

McGowan Development is trying to revive the building with David Jump, the investor who bought the 13-story, 500,000-square-foot building last year. An arm of Citicorp, which foreclosed on the block-wide building in 2009 for $5.5 million, sold it to AB Acres, a corporation held by Jump.

The building occupies a prime spot on Tucker Boulevard and is among downtown’s most historic structures. Built as the Hotel Jefferson, it went up in time for the 1904 World’s Fair. The then-posh, 400-room establishment was the headquarters hotel for the 1904 and 1916 Democratic Party national conventions. It was later expanded to more than 900 rooms and hosted a who’s who of notable visitors for decades before sliding into disrepair.

McGowan said the building’s 360-car garage, part of the hotel’s 1920s expansion and remarkable then for its innovative design, was an important part of the new project. The garage’s parking fees cover the current debt service and taxes on the Jefferson Arms, he said.

But the project is more about people than cars. McGowan said he hoped Teach for America would draw additional education-related nonprofits that would fill one-time hotel space and provide business for a conference center planned in what had been the hotel’s “grand hall.” A charter school would be another welcome component, he said.

Availability of a large conference center would increase the number of meetings Teach for America holds in St. Louis, Baier said. Cost is a big factor, said Baier, adding that a conference site this year in Kansas City was a $55 cab ride from the airport. In comparison, downtown St. Louis has competitive hotel rates and is a $3.75 MetroLink ride from Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, he noted.

Baier said the decision to move to the Jefferson Arms grew out of conversations with U.S. Bancorp’s Community Development Corp., which has invested in several downtown projects. Zack Boyers, the corporation’s chief executive, put Baier in touch with the McGowans.

“For us, it’s a win-win,” Baier said. “We love working with these guys.”

Matt Philpott, director of the development corporation’s New Markets program, said the redone Jefferson Arms “would bring a lot of people and activity to downtown” and increase demand for more services nearby.

The St. Louis project is modeled in part after Teach for America’s home in Baltimore.

Seawall Development of Baltimore spent about $20 million to renovate an abandoned can factory near Johns Hopkins University as Miller’s Court, which houses Teach for America’s Baltimore office, other nonprofits and about 100 apartments. Thibault Manekin, a Seawall principal, said the McGowans visited Miller’s Court this year.

“They spent the day with us, just touring around and brainstorming,” Manekin said.

New markets, plus state and historic preservation tax credits, are essential to such projects, said Manekin, adding that in exchange for incentives, the developments spur neighborhood revitalization.

Miller’s Court, opened in 2009, brought together from across the country new teachers who had been unfamiliar with Baltimore before joining Teach for America. The project also returned an abandoned building to active use and helped revive what had been a “forgotten” neighborhood, Manekin said.

Courtney Cass, Teach for America’s leader in Baltimore, said teachers with her group occupy about 70 apartments at Miller’s Court. The building has a waiting list, she added.

She and Baier said that many teachers stayed in their new cities after they completed their Teach for America work. Some continue to teach; others start businesses. In any event, the young, college-educated people energize their new home cities, Cass and Baier said.

“Getting top talent to stay here is what is really important,” Baier said.

Source

Virgin America CEO David Cush believes flying doesn’t have to be painful. He remembers when boarding a plane was exciting and wants to bring back that joy.

That is why every job applicant, including pilots, flight attendants and baggage handlers, takes a personality test. He wants employees who are hard-wired with positive outlooks on life.

Virgin America, which is partly owned by Richard Branson, the founder of the edgy British airline Virgin Atlantic, doesn’t aim to be the biggest carrier. It only flies between big cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago and Boston, serving about 5 million passengers annually _ a tiny fraction of the size of major airlines like Delta and United.

But Cush wants Virgin America to be recognized for superior quality _ and he appears to be succeeding. The airline, based near San Francisco, has routinely ranked at the top of customer surveys.

The past month has been a little rocky, though. Since the airline switched to a new reservation system on Oct. 28, customers have not been able to change or cancel flights online or select seats on Virgin America’s website. Instead, they’ve had to call the airline or wait until they got to the airport. Cush emailed a letter to the 56,000 passengers affected apologizing for the problem and the airline says it hopes to have it fully resolved by the first week in December.

Virgin America’s fleet is made up of brand-new Airbus A319s and A320s, fuel-efficient aircraft that seat 119 and 146. Each is equipped with TVs for every passenger, colorful mood lighting and Wi-Fi. Instead of flight attendants dictating meal times, passengers buy food when they want it by pressing a few buttons on their TV.

“If you talk to people about what is most frustrating about air travel, what comes out is the loss of control,” Cush says. “We’ve been pushing to give people control again.”

Virgin isn’t the first U.S. airline to use TVs and friendly service to attract customers. Cush acknowledges some copying as he works to create the California version of New York-based JetBlue.

“JetBlue came around and had a different type of service. That opened my eyes,” he says.

But his quest to create a fun airline has been stymied by more serious concerns like high fuel prices and a recession whose impact is still being felt.

Since it started flying in August 2007, Virgin America has lost $661.4 million. Cush expects to become profitable in 2012, a year later than originally planned.

The privately held company is owned by a New York hedge fund, Richard Branson’s Virgin Group and private investors, including Donald J. Carty, the former head of American Airlines’ parent company, AMR Corp.

Cush, 51, spent most of his career at American and left to head up Virgin America just four months after the airline started flying.

The Shreveport, La.-native is a graduate of Southern Methodist University _ yet a giant Louisiana State University football fan.

In his spare time, Cush likes to swim and fish. In college, he was a DJ, spinning Bruce Springsteen and Pink Floyd tunes.

Cush visited The Associated Press in New York. Below are excerpts, edited for clarity, of the interview where he spoke about the health of American, his favorite seat and why risk-taking is necessary to survive.

Q: How is Virgin America different?

A: The biggest difference is our in-flight entertainment system. It’s a nine-inch screen _ larger than JetBlue. We’ve got live TV, on-demand movies, about 3,000 MP3s. We have food and drink on-demand. We’re the only airline in the world that has it. You order from the seatback, swipe your credit card. They see seat 12C wants a turkey sandwich and a Heineken and bring it to you on a tray. Carts aren’t blocking the aisles.

Q: Who came up with that?

A: This was designed before my time but as I tell people, as time goes on and memories fade it will become my idea.

Q: How much more are people willing to pay for these services?

A: The model is getting them to pay the same amount with a much lower production cost.

Q: How can you attract business travelers when your miles can’t be redeemed for Hawaii, Europe or other places you don’t serve?

A: The mile problem will be solved early next year. We have basic agreements with Virgin Atlantic and Virgin Australia that will be fully reciprocal. We also have agreements with Cathay Pacific, Singapore and Emirates that will develop into frequent flier relationships.

Q: In Dallas, you’re telling fliers to “dump your older airline for a younger, hotter one.” American responded by slashing fares to San Francisco and Los Angeles. Can you survive this fare war?

A: We’ll survive. At current fares, it will not be a profitable route but it wouldn’t be such a loss-making one where we would consider any type of reduction. You have to be in Dallas-Fort Worth if you’re going to be a business airline.

Q: In one ad you refer to American as running a cattle car. If you feel that way, how could you have worked there for 22 years?

A: It wasn’t always that way. The industry, out of survival, did a lot of things. One of the reasons I left was because I didn’t think the industry had to operate that way.

Q: Why did you get into the business?

A: I don’t think anyone knows why they get in unless they are a pilot or an aviation enthusiast. I wanted to live in Dallas. American was a big employer. Young, single, the ability to fly around anywhere you wanted to, it all sounded pretty good. Once you get in, you find it so intellectually demanding that you can’t see yourself doing anything else.

Q: Do you think that American is on the right path?

A: It’s hard to tell. There’s a culture there that is perhaps a bit risk-averse. In the past, it was always an airline that was willing to accept risk. The industry’s consolidated around it and all of a sudden American finds itself in third place. I don’t know if they have the answer. I do know their top guys. They’re smart, capable but at some point you need to stick your neck out a little bit if you’re going to get out of a rut.

Q: Are you a risk-taker?

A: Absolutely. But I don’t take unnecessary risk and I always have an exit strategy.

Q: Mile for mile, airplanes burn more fuel than cars, trucks or trains. Do you think this poses a problem for the industry?

A: If we don’t find a way to clean up air travel, we’ll become a pariah. We’ll be what the coal companies used to be.

Q: You’re in 14 markets. Where would you like to fly to next?

A: We’ve been trying to get into Newark, (N.J.) since the day we started. This is a huge policy issue _ slots and gates are tied up by legacy carriers. The economics of keeping us out of Newark are huge for United so they’ll fly unprofitable (regional jets) just to occupy slots. When we go into markets, fares drop by 30 or 40 percent.

Q: When you fly your own airline you always pick the second row of coach. Why?

A: I get to watch the interaction between our in-flight teammates and the customers in first. It’s a nice seat, 4A.

Q: A window.

A: I’m a window guy. Our in-flight entertainment system has Google Maps. You zoom in when you see something on the ground you’re interested in.

Q: How would you describe yourself as a boss?

A: I’m probably a tough guy to work for. I’m pretty demanding and part of the reason is the airline business is a demanding business. We have very little margin for error in building this into a successful company. We have 2,500 people that rely on us for a paycheck.

Q: Do you ever get overshadowed by Richard Branson?

A: All the time. People want to talk to him, they want to see him. When he’s around, I’m just the hired help.

Q: How much patience do you have for unprofitable routes?

A: We stopped service to two different places. One because we needed the aircraft, that was Orange County, (Calif.). We didn’t see that as a big strategic need. The other is Toronto. We misjudged the market.

Q: Did you fire the guy who pushed that route?

A: That was me, so no.

Q: In ten years, do you see Virgin America being a full-blown national airline?

A: That’s not our goal. The biggest discipline we need to have is not outgrowing the model. That means maybe 100, 150 aircraft, probably no more. The goal would be to be consistently profitable, the highest quality airline where we can hopefully make a few hours of people’s day a little bit nicer.

Q: Will you go public?

A: As much as it’s nice being private _ because you don’t have to manage to the short term and there are a lot of burdensome regulations that come from being public _ ultimately we need to (do an initial public offering.) It’s a capital-intensive business. We need to tap public markets and our investors want to take some money off the table. It could be 2013 if the market is ready.

Q: How do you unwind after leaving the office?

A: I do a lot of yoga. It’s a nice way to separate the mind from what you’ve gone through all day.

Source

Concordia honored

Tropical Storm Kenneth is strengthening in the eastern Pacific Ocean, with forecasters calling it a rare late-season tropical storm.

The U.S. National Hurricane Center in Miami said Sunday that Kenneth had maximum sustained winds near 50 mph (85 kph). The storm was centered about 505 miles (810 kilometers) south of Manzanillo, Mexico, but was moving away from the coast.

Projections show Kenneth moving west out to sea, away from land, over the next several days.

The eastern Pacific hurricane season ends Nov. 30.

Source

ROME